سیاست گذاری پیشرفت شهری

سیاست گذاری پیشرفت شهری

واکاوی نقش و اثرات طرح‏ های توسعۀ شهری در ازخودبیگانگی و اتمیزه شدن انسان شهری (نمونۀ موردی: کلان‏شهر تهران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ هنر و معماری، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
این پژوهش دربارۀ نقش مداخلات برنامه‏ریزی شهری در شکل‏دهی به ازخودبیگانگی انسان در تهران است. با وجود سرعت قابل ‏توجهی که در رشد کالبدی کلان‌شهر تهران مانند جاده‏ها، پل‏ها و برج‏ها وجود دارد، به نظر می‏رسد به همان میزان انسان‏ها با خود، همشهریان و محیط اطرافشان بیگانه می‏شوند. ازخودبیگانگی شهری، گسست اجتماعی و عدم پیوند میان افراد و محیط شهری به یکی از چالش‏های اساسی زندگی شهری مدرن تبدیل شده‏اند. طی تقریباً نیم‏قرن گذشته، طرح‏های سه‏گانۀ توسعۀ شهری تهران که با هدف بهبود کیفیت زندگی شهری اجرا شدند، به‏ طور ناخواسته این مشکلات را تشدید کرده‏اند. این طرح‏ها به عنوان اصلی‏ترین سندهای راهبردی شهر و ملاک عمل در مداخلات، به‏ جای ایجاد پلی میان انسان (درون) و شهر (برون)، حس ناتوانی و عدم تسلط بر زندگی را بیش از پیش افزایش داده‏اند به ‏گونه‏ای که شاید بتوان گفت که فاصلۀ بین انسان با خودش را نیز تشدید کرده‏اند. پژوهش حاضر به دنبال پاسخ به این سؤال است که آیا طرح‏های توسعۀ شهری به عنوان سند راهبردی در کلان‏شهرها در حل مسئلۀ ازخودبیگانگیِ انسانِ شهرنشین، اندیشه‏ورزی و چاره‏‏جویی می‏کنند؟ و به بیانی دیگر، آیا می‏شود از طریق طرح‏های توسعۀ شهری به حل این مسئله پرداخت؟ رویکرد پژوهش در کنار مرور ادبیات نظری، از طریق روش کیفی و با استفاده از تکنیک دلفی، مصاحبه‏ای با نخبگان و متخصصان این حوزه صورت گرفت. یافته‏ها نشان می‏دهد «افول قلمروی عمومی» با 68/10 درصد، «ساخت‏وساز مدوام و بی‏قوارگی کالبدی» با 71/9 درصد و «افزایش ابعاد بزرگراهی» با 74/8 درصد تأثیر زیادی در گسترش و عمق بخشیدن به ازخودبیگانگی و اتمیزه شدن انسان شهری داشته‏اند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Exploring the Role and Effects of Urban Development Planning on Alienation and Atomization of Urban Individuals (Case Study: Tehran Metropolis)

نویسندگان English

Ali Faramarzi Rad 1
Mohammad Hossein Boochani 2
1 PH.D. Student, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

This research explores the role of urban planning interventions in shaping urban alienation in Tehran. Despite the remarkable speed of physical growth in the metropolis of Tehran—including roads, bridges, and skyscrapers—it seems that individuals are becoming increasingly alienated from themselves, their citizens, and their surrounding environment. Urban alienation, social fragmentation, and the disconnection between individuals and their urban surroundings have emerged as fundamental challenges of modern urban life. Over the past half-century, the three urban development plans of Tehran, designed to improve the quality of urban life, have inadvertently exacerbated these issues. As the primary strategic documents guiding urban interventions, these plans, instead of bridging the gap between human (inside) and the city (outside), have intensified feelings of powerlessness and lack of control over life. It could even be argued that they have deepened the distance between individuals and their own inner selves. The present study seeks to answer the question of whether urban development plans, as strategic documents in metropolises, address the issue of urban human alienation, reflection, and problem solving. In other words, can this issue be effectively tackled through urban development plans? The research approach, alongside a review of theoretical literature, employed a qualitative methodology using the Delphi technique to conduct interviews with experts and specialists in this field. The findings reveal that the decline of public spaces (10.68%), Persistent construction and physical monotony (9.71%), Expansion of large-scale highways (8.74%). These factors have played a significant role in expanding and deepening urban human alienation and social atomization.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Urban Alienation
Urban Development Planning
Urbanized Individual
  1. Rahmani, Mehrdad, Azizi, Mohammad Mahdi. Analyzing the Transformations of "Understanding Tehran" in Its Urban Development Plans. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture and Urban Planning, 2021; 26(1): 31-41.
  2. Hern M. Outside the outside: Alienation, fidelity, and new sub-urbanizations. In: Keil R, Wu F, editors. After suburbia: Urbanization in the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2022. p. 319-338.
  3. Seeman, M., On the meaning of alienation. American sociological review, 1959: p. 783-791.
  4. Sihombing A. Alienation in urban design and built environment: A literature review for unalienating cities. Proceedings of The 6th International Conference on ECO Engineering Development; 2022 Nov 8.
  5. Barati, N., Challenges have to be faced in the context of urbanism in Iran at the beginning of the 21th century. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 2006. 3(6): p. 5-29.
  6. Wilson TD. Strangers to ourselves: discovering the adaptive unconscious. Translated by Norouzi S. Tehran: Parseh Publishing; 2023. 392 p.
  7. Friedmann, J., Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American planning Association, 1993. 59(4): p. 482-485.
  8. Nayebi, H. and T. Azadarmaki, Religiousness and the Impact of Education on It in Iran. VOL. 26 (T) FEB. 2018, 2018: p. 165.
  9. Farabiasl, N., M. Rafiean, and M. Khatibi, Development of a theoretical model of urban space production in Abbasabad lands of Tehran, Emphasizing the power relations of actors Based on Grand Theory (using Atlasti qualitative analysis software). 2023.
  10. Buchholz T. New directions in Frankfurt critical theory for critical urban theory. In: Handbook of Urban Studies. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2021. p. 151-172.
  11. Banerjee, T., The future of public space: Beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American planning association, 2001. 67(1): p. 9-24.
  12. Carmona, M., Principles for public space design, planning to do better. Urban Design International, 2019. 24: p. 47-59.
  13. Cattell, V., et al., Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & place, 2008. 14(3): p. 544-561.
  14. Talen, E., New urbanism and American planning: The conflict of cultures. 2005: Routledge.
  15. Zamani F, Mehan A. The abstract space and the alienation of political public space in the Middle East. Archnet-IJAR. 2019;13(3):483–497.
  16. Fakouhi N. Making and Remaking an Academic Tradition: Towards an Indigenous Anthropology in Iran. Conceptualizing Iranian Anthropology: Past and Present Perspectives; 2010. p. 87-115.
  17. Roozbehani, M., B. Sarookhani, and S. Parvin, Using Virtual Social Networks and Social Tolerance among Youths in Tehran. Sociological Studies of Youth, 2020. 11(38): p.79-100.
  18. Geis, K.J. and C.E. Ross, A new look at urban alienation: The effect of neighborhood disorder on perceived powerlessness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1998: p. 232-246.
  19. Irandoost, K., et al., Placemaking and the right to the city of urban poor: a case studyin Sanandaj, Iran. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2019. 12(4): p. 508-528.
  20. Øversveen E. Capitalism and alienation: Towards a Marxist theory of alienation for the 21st century. European Journal of Social Theory. 2022 Aug; 25(3):440-57.
  21. Yousefi A, Mohammadi F. Forms of Alienation from the Perspective of City Sociologists. Sociological Review. 2019 Feb 20; 25(2):481-504.
  22. Simmel G. The metropolis and mental life. In: Wolff K, editor. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1950. p. 409-424.
  23. Mumford L. The city in history: its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World; 1961.
  24. Sá Tv. Urbanism and Urban planning following the thoughts of Henri Lefebvre. with transactions on ecology and the environment. 2018 dec 17;217:157-64.
  25. Bauman Z. The Individualized Society. 1st ed. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2001. 259 p.
  26. Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. 247p.
  27. Rehmann J. Theories of Ideology: The Powers of Alienation and Subjection. Leiden: Brill; 2013.
  28. Fuchs C. Communication and Capitalism: A Critical Theory. London: University of Westminster Press; 2020. 270 p.
  29. Zhang B, Zhang H, Yang X. Research on Social Atomization Risk and Governance Decision Making in Emerging Community. In: Applications of Decision Science in Management. Singapore: Springer; 2022:119-126.
  30. Wiryomartono B. Alienation and Urban Globalization: A Consequence of Modern Existential Addiction? Sustainability. 2023; 15(1):479. doi:10.3390/su15010479.
  31. Robu-Movilă A. Neurourbanism: from effective to affective computing in urban planning. Revista Şcolii Doctorale de Urbanism. 2025;10(1):85-94.
  32. Henning C. Introduction: Speaking of alienation. InTheories of Alienation 2025 (pp. 1-16). Routledge.
  33. Ran S. Modernity and Alienation: Revisiting Marx’s Theory in Contemporary Cultural Contexts. Cultura: International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology. 2025; 22(1).
  34. Kalantari A, Bashiri Givi H, Gholami Shahsavarlo S. Sociological analysis of cultural and social factors affecting social alienation among urban residents of Givi City. 2012;53-63.
  35. Abbasi K. A sociological inquiry into alienation, city, and story (Examining the phenomenon of alienation in the urban society of Moscow in the story "Heart of a Dog"). Urban Sociological Studies. 2020 Feb 20;9(33):109-138.
  36. Baghban Moshiri, N., Varij Kazemi, A., Rabiei, K., Ahmadipour, Z. Alienation in Everyday Life: Case Study of Urban Space in Tehran. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Journal of Social Sciences, 2022; 19(3): 170-137.
  37. Hajian Aghaei. Sociological analysis of socio-cultural factors influencing social alienation (Case study: District 4 of Qazvin City). Urban Futures Quarterly. 2023 Jul 23;3(2):72-87.
  38. Azadbakht M, Jahanifar M. Analyzing the contexts and measuring the causal structure of the feeling of alienation in urban spaces. 2024.
  39. Habibi, A., A. Sarafrazi, and S. Izadyar, Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 2014. 3(4): p. 8-13.
  40. Bahra B, Rafieian M. Evolution of the nature of conflict and conflict management in urban planning: A systematic review, Motaleate Shahri, 13 (51), 49–72. 2024.
  41. Tachir G, Evcil AN. City of the Future Theories: A Diachronic Comparative Study. Journal of Urban Culture Research. 2025; 25:219-32.
دوره 1، شماره 1
زمستان 1403
صفحه 35-55

  • تاریخ دریافت 25 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 آبان 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 30 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ انتشار 15 دی 1403