1. Ramezani N, Tamošaitienė J, Sarvari H, Golestanizadeh M. Determining Essential Indicators for Feasibility Assessment of Using Initiative Green Building Methods in Revitalization of Worn-Out Urban Fabrics. Sustainability. 2025;17(8):1–22.
2. doi: 10.3390/su17083389.
3. Hedayatnezhad Kashi SM, Hashemkhani Zolfani S, Ghane M, et al. Development drivers for urban regeneration and livability in worn-out neighborhoods. Int J Strateg Prop Manag. 2025;29(2):81–92. doi: 10.3846/ijspm.2025.23585.
4. Dehghan Pour Farashah MH, Niemczewska ZE, Guimarães PPC. Exploring the Effectiveness of Urban Regeneration: The Comparative Study of the Industrial Heritage Sites of Łódź (Poland) and Yazd (Iran). Eur J Geogr. 2025;16(2):314–34. doi: 10.48088/ejg.m.far.16.2.314.334
5. Alim S, Polak J. Public–private partnerships for future urban infrastructure. Proc Inst Civ Eng Manag Procure Law. 2016;169(4):150–8. doi: 10.1680/jmapl.16.00001.
6. Mirzakhani A, Turró M, Behzadfar M. Sustainable regeneration strategies for the historical city centers of Iran using SWOT and QSPM models. J Cult Herit Manag Sustain Dev. 2023;13(4):794–813. doi: 10.1108/JCHMSD-02-2021-0022.
7. Zarei-Rahro A, Taherpour-Kalantari H, Najaf-Beigi R. A Model for Public-Private Partnership in the Public Services Sector. Manag Dev Process. 2019;32(1):27–54. doi: 10.29252/jmdp.32.1.27.
8. Das D, Shrivastav MK, Krishna SVSP PJS, et al. Public-private partnerships (PPP) in infrastructure financing: A comparative study of developed and developing economies. Herit Sustain Dev. 2025;7(1):443–52. doi: 10.37868/hsd.v7i1.1087.
9. Taheri M, Rezvani NS, Shormij RA. Smart City Development: Analyzing the Feasibility of Smart Water Supply Systems in Qazvin. Int J Invent Eng Sci. 2025;12(4):15–9. doi: 10.35940/ijies.D1069.12040425.
10. Park EJ, Kang E, Shin Y. Urban regeneration and community participation: a critical review of project-based research. Open House Int. 2025;50(5):834–56. doi: 10.1108/OHI-04-2024-0127.
11. Vale de Paula P, Cunha Marques R, Gonçalves JM. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Regeneration Projects: The Brazilian Context and the Case of “Porto Maravilha” in Rio de Janeiro. Land. 2025;14(5):1055. doi: 10.3390/land14051055.
12. Gupta N. Urban Development and Banking: Financing Growth, Inclusion, and Sustainability. Int J Res Publ Semin. 2024;15(4):188–213. doi: 10.36676/jrps.v15.i4.309.
13. Jandaghi Meibodi, F. , Jafarzadeh Najar, M. and Kosari, A. A. (2020). Investigating Factors Affecting owners and Residents Participation in Financing Residential projects of Renovation and Improvement plan of Texture Around the Holy Shrine of Imam Reza. Urban Economics, 5(1), 99-112. doi: 10.22108/ue.2021.121523.1133
14. Noring L. Public asset corporation_ A new vehicle for urban regeneration and infrastructure finance. Cities. 2019;11:125–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.002.
15. Orekan A, Richard M. A Systematic Review on Land Accessibility for Private Sector Driven Housing Delivery in Urban Areas of Developing Countries. J Environ Manag Constr Res. 2025;9(4):1–26. doi: 10.70382/bejemcr.v9i4.037.
16. Codecasa G, Ponzini D. Public–Private Partnership: A Delusion for Urban Regeneration? Evidence from Italy. Eur Plan Stud. 2011;19:647–67. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548471.
17. Heydari M, Fan Y, Li X, Lai KK. Risk Management in Public-Private Partnerships. 2020:97–9. doi: 10.4324/9781003112051.
18. Chen L, Chang C. Discovering the relationship between economic, socio-cultural factors and popularization of services. J Harv Bus Rev. 2021;40(12):2-25. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-4151-3.ch015.
19. Thandapani V, Arulmurugan M. An Economic Study on Income and Expenditure Activities on Nochikuppam Slum Areas, Chennai City. YMER Digit. 2021;20(12):545–50. doi: 10.37896/ymer20.12/41.
20. Ng MK, Cook A, Chui WT. The Road Not Travelled: A Sustainable Urban Regeneration Strategy for Hong Kong. Plan Pract Res. 2001;16:171–83. doi: 10.1080/02697450120077370.
21. Luo Z, Li J, Wu Z, Li S, Bi G. Investigating the Driving Factors of Public Participation in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Projects—A Case Study of China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(9):1–20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095192.
22. Haruță C, Radu BV. Citizen Participation in the Decision Making Process at Local and County Levels in the Romanian Public Instituitons. Transylvanian Rev Adm Sci. 2010;(6):76–92.
23. Bergh SI, Jari M. Introduction to the Special Journal Issue: Spaces for Change? Decentralization, Participation and Local Governance in the Middle East/North Africa Region. 2010.
24. Jayasena NS, Chan DWM, Kumaraswamy M. A systematic literature review and analysis towards developing PPP models for delivering smart infrastructure. Built Environ Proj Asset Manag. 2021;11(1):121–37. doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-11-2019-0124.
25. Khan AT, Bhatnagar V, Siddiqui O. Assessing the Effectiveness and Challenges of Viability Gap Funding (VGF) in Public-Private Partnership (PPP) Infrastructure Projects. J Inf Syst Eng Manag. 2025;10(34s):741–50. doi: 10.52783/jisem.v10i34s.5868.
26. Guijie. Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Infrastructure Development. J Lifestyle SDGs Rev. 2025;5(5):e06622. doi: 10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n05.pe06622.
27. Rasouli B, Kherdiar S, Bani Mahd B. Application of agency theory for risk allocation of public-private-government partnership in the context of resistance economy (Case study: Water and wastewater industry of Guilan province). J Quant Stud Manag. 2024;11(3):107–33. Available from: https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/935305. (in Persian)
28. Karimzadeh M. The role of public participation in the reconstruction of dilapidated urban fabric with emphasis on the role of Khoy Municipality. Mod Res Geogr Sci Archit Urban Plann. 2023;5(44):229–39. Available from: https://www.pantajournals.ir/buy.aspx?id=100417&t=1. (in Persian)
29. Akbari N, Andalib A, Toghyani S, Mohamadi M. Identifying barriers to achieving recreational goals in the planning of urban decay laws. J Appl Res Geogr Sci. 2021;21(61):24. doi:10.52547/jgs.21.61.447. (in Persian)
30. Abedi S. Financing tools and factors affecting people’s participation in environmental rehabilitation of green city (Meta-analysis of studies in Iran). Urban Econ Plann. 2020;1(1):1–18. doi:10.22034/UE.2020.09.01. (in Persian)
31. Shahriari MR. Investigating the level of public participation in the reconstruction of dilapidated urban fabric. Case study: Shahdee-e-Allah Street, Shiraz. Green Archit. 2019;5(2):10–9. Available from: http://www.greenarchitecture.ir/post.aspx?id=597. (in Persian)
32. Abedi S. The Analysis of Status of Urban Renewal Financing Methods in Upstream Documentation and Development Plans Laws of Iran. Rahyaft. 2019;29(2):31–52. doi:10.22034/rahyaft.2019.13765. (in Persian)
33. Iranmanesh S, Shakibayi A, Nazari Robati F. Ranking Challenges Facing Construction Investors in Vanished Texture of Kerman. IUESA. 2019;7(27):46–55. Available from: http://iueam.ir/article-1-1245-fa.html. (in Persian)
34. Zareian K, Sarwar R, Arghan A. Factors affecting the implementation of the public-private partnership model in Tehran urban development. New Perspect Hum Geogr. 2018;10(4):232–50. Available from: https://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/859931. (in Persian)
35. Heydari MT, Meshkini A, Ahadnejad Roushati M. Land recycling in dilapidated areas with the approach of meeting urban housing needs (Case study: dilapidated area of the central part of Zanjan city). Geogr Space. 2018;61:1–24. Available from: http://geographical-space.iau-ahar.ac.ir/article-1-3262-en.html. (in Persian)
36. Amini M, Rahnama MR. Investigating the role of participation of government and private organizations and institutions in the reconstruction of dilapidated urban fabric (case study: Sarshour neighborhood of Mashhad). In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Research in Science and Technology; 2016. Available from: https://civilica.com/doc/1746128/. (in Persian)
37. Bigdali Kazemi F. Pathology of the participation pattern of actors of dilapidated urban textures in the renovation process and presenting a desirable model to increase participation. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Sustainable Architecture and Urban Development; 2013. Available from: https://civilica.com/doc/214274. (in Persian)
38. Habibi M, Marsousi N, Ali Akbari E. Identifying and prioritizing appropriate strategies for organizing the dilapidated fabric of the central part of Qazvin city with a sustainable urban regeneration approach using AHP-SWOT techniques. Q J Hum Environ. 2013;66:59–75. Available from: https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/he/Article/848124. (in Persian)
39. Fu D, Chen T, Lang W. Evolutionary Patterns and Mechanism Optimization of Public Participation in Community Regeneration Planning: A Case Study of Guangzhou. Land. 2025;14(7):1–25. doi: 10.3390/land14071394.
40. Shen Y, Tan R, Zhang S. Co-Creation, Co-Construction, and Co-Governance in Community Renewal: A Case Study of Civic Participation and Sustainable Mechanisms. Land. 2025;14(8):1–29. doi: 10.3390/land14081577
41. Yang Y, Azmi NF, Hakimi HA, Pan L. Unpacking the Dynamics of Heritage-Led Regeneration: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach for Traditional Villages of Hebei, China. Land. 2025;14(9):1–25. doi: 10.3390/land14091925.
42. Zhang F, Zhou X. Structural renovation of blocks in build-up area of Jiangnan cities, taking Suzhou new district as an example. iScience. 2023;26(12):108553. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108553.
43. Ragab TS. The crisis of cultural identity in rehabilitating historic Beirut downtown. Cities. 2021;28(1):107–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2010.04.001.
44. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.
