Urban Development Policy Making

Urban Development Policy Making

Studying Successful Urban Investment Models In Developed Countries With An Emphasis On Innovative Approaches: Developing A Proposed Model For Tehran Municipality

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master of Science in Theoretical Economics, Faculty of Economic and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 , PhD Student in Economic Sciences, Urban and Regional Economics, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting, Yazd University, Iran
10.22034/judpm.2025.537238.1056
Abstract
With increasing urbanization and mounting pressure on the financial resources of cities—especially in developing countries—it is vital to develop innovative urban investment models. This study adopts a comparative approach to analyze successful urban investment practices in countries with advanced urban economies, such as Germany, the Netherlands, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Singapore, and Japan. Drawing on these case studies, the research aims to present a localized policy framework for the Municipality of Tehran.
Amid rapid urbanization (urban population rising from 35% in 1950 to over 55% in 2015 and projected to reach 66% by 2050), many cities face severe fiscal constraints. Although Tehran’s municipal revenues grew from 84,617 billion rials in 2011 to 2,056,589 billion rials in 2025, the share of financing through investment has remained marginal—averaging just 1.2% over fourteen years, with a peak of only 3% in 2012. This underscores the need for more effective investment strategies. The study identifies four key components of successful urban investment: (1) institutional and legal frameworks, (2) innovative financial instruments, (3) stakeholder collaboration, and (4) data-driven governance. Based on these pillars, it proposes the "Smart Investable City Model" for Tehran. This model aims to increase investment-based financing, enhance financial self-reliance, and promote participatory, transparent development.
Keywords

Subjects


1.    Hodgkinson G, Jallal H, Martin S. Circular economy in cities. Abbasi SM, translator. Reisi SH, scientific editor; Deyani GH, language editor. Isfahan: General Directorate of Communications and International Affairs of Isfahan Municipality; 2021. [Persian].
2.    United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). Unlocking the Potential of Cities: Financing Sustainable Urban Development; 2023.
3.    Correia J, Ferreira F, Meidute-Kavaliauskiene I, Pereira L, Zopounidis C, Correia R. Factors influencing urban investment attractiveness: an FCM-SD approach. Factors influencing urban investment attractiveness: an FCM-SD approach. 2020(4):237-50.
4.    Terraza HC, Schuring MC, Kemperman MP, Quintero Garzon MC. Sustainable Urban and Regional Development Umbrella Program (SURGE): FY2021 Annual Report.
5.    Mirdehghan A, Almodarresi A. [Investigating and identifying factors affecting investment encouragement in Ashkezar Municipality]. Geographical Sciences. 2020 Fall-Winter;33:12–21. [Persian]
6.    Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University. Urban Redevelopment – Global Expert Dialogue [Internet]. Suzhou: XJTLU; [cited 2025 June 12]. Available from: https://www.xjtlu.edu.cn/en/professional-services/urban-and-environmental-studies-university-research-centre/global-exchange-and-local-cooperation/global-expert-dialogue/urban-redevelopment
7.    Choi YS. Smart city development projects in the Republic of Korea. R-Economy. 2020. Vol. 6. Iss. 1. 2020;6(1):40-9.
8.    Karimnia S. [Financial management system of Tehran Municipality: pathology and solutions in light of a comparative study of ten cities – London, Zurich, New York, Toronto, Auckland, Vienna, Beijing, Tokyo, Dubai, and Istanbul]. Pajuheshhaye Hoghooghi (Legal Researches). 2022 Nov 22;21(51):513–44. [Persian]
9.    OECD (2024), OECD Economic Surveys: Japan 2024, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/41e807f9-en.
10.              Hwang JS, Heo YJ, Han A, Hwang JS, Ju B. Smart cities in the Republic of Korea_A journey towards institutionalization and innovation.
11.              Auckland Transport Capital Investment Programme 2024 to 2025, Available from: https://at.govt.nz/
12.              National Audit Office. Lessons Learned: Private Finance for Infrastructure. HC 767, 19 March 2025.
13.              Löffler E. The state of intermediary city finances: A rapid analysis [Internet]. Barcelona: United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG); 2016 [cited 2025 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.gold.uclg.org/sites/default/files/Loffler_EN.pdf
14.              McKinsey & Company. Unlocking the full potential of city revenues [Internet]. 2019 Jul 12 [cited 2025 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/unlocking-the-full-potential-of-city-revenues
15.              Ragheb M, Shahri R. Financial resource shortages in municipalities and the substitution of sustainable revenues. Journal of Urban Design Studies and Urban Research. 2020 Summer;3(2):89–98. [Persian]
16.              Faridvand E. Investment in urban projects. Economic Journal (Monthly‑Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policies). 2018;18(9–10):133–147. [Persian]
17.              Amiri MR. Pathology of investment in municipalities as a suitable financial tool to improve capital attraction. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Planning, Environment & Islamic Art Horizons in the Statement of the Second Step of the Revolution; 2023; Tabriz, Iran. Available from: https://civilica.com/doc/1959981. [Persian]
18.              United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). How to formulate a national urban policy [Internet]. Nairobi: UN-Habitat; 2019 [cited 2025 Nov 15]. Available from: https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/documents/2019-05/
19.              OECD. Financing Cities of Tomorrow [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023 [cited 2025 Nov 15]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/07/financing-cities-of-tomorrow_56b303e0/51bd124a-en.pdf
20.              Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. Municipal Securities: Financing the Nation’s Infrastructure [Internet]. Washington (DC): MSRB; 2021 [cited 2025 June 12]. Available from: https://www.msrb.org/sites/default/files/MSRB-Infrastructure-Primer.pdf
21.              Collier A, Biswas R. A Bridge Too Far: Can China’s LGFVs tackle their debt issues? CKGSB Knowledge. 2025 Jan 3 [cited 2025 June 12]. Available from: https://english.ckgsb.edu.cn/knowledge/article/a-bridge-too-far-can-chinas-lgfvs-tackle-their-debt-issues/
22.              Hoelscher K. Business, Politics and Urban Peacebuilding in Colombia: The Case of Empresas Públicas de Medellín. ReliefWeb [cited 2025 June 12]. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/colombia/business-politics-and-urban-peacebuilding-colombia-case-empresas-p-blicas-de-medell
23.              Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Financing A City’s Vision: The Social Mobilization of Land Values in São Paulo [cited 2025 June 12]. Available from: https://www.lincolninst.edu/case-studies/financing-citys-vision/
24.              Rajabi Z, Kazemi Laksar H, Bahramkhah M. An investigation into external financing methods for municipal projects. Majournal [Internet]. 10 Sep 2021 [cited 2025 June 12];5(18):188–9. Available from: https://majournal.ir/index.php/ma/article/view/1063. [Persian]
25.              Amiri MR. Pathology of investment in municipalities as appropriate financing tools to improve capital attraction. In: 3rd International Conference on Architecture, Civil Engineering, Urban Development, Environment, and Horizons of Islamic Art in the Second Step Statement of the Revolution; 2023; Tabriz, Iran [Internet]. Civilica; 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 21]. Available from: https://civilica.com/doc/1959981. [Persian]
26.              Koetter T, Sikder SK, Weiss D. The cooperative urban land development model in Germany-An effective instrument to support affordable housing. Land Use Policy. 2021 Aug 1;107:105481.
27.              Fattahian M, Nouraei H, Nasresfahani R. Meta-synthesis of land value capture (LVC) mechanisms and their implementation tools. Urban Economics. 2024;9(2):31–46. [Persian]
28.              Kim J. The Evaluation and Significance of Smart City Projects in Korea: Targeting Enterprises within the Smart City Association Convergence Alliance. Sustainability. 2024 Mar 25;16(7):2697.
29.              Zhang Y, Xu M, Liu J. Urban competitiveness evaluation in China: A comparative study using PCA and equal weighting methods. Sustainability. 2023;15(14):11234. doi:10.3390/su151411234
30.              De Noni I, Orsi L, Zanderighi L. Attributes of Milan influencing city brand attractiveness: a case study of Milan. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 2014 Aug;3(4):218–26. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2014.06.001
31.              Sáez L, Periáñez I, Heras-Saizarbitoria I. Measuring urban competitiveness: ranking European large urban zones. Journal of Place Management and Development. 2017 Dec 4;10(5):479-96.
32.              Litavniece L. The evaluation of a town’s attractiveness: a case study of Balvi city. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Scientific Conference “New Dimensions in the Development of Society”; 2011 Oct 6–7; Jelgava, Latvia. Jelgava: Latvia University of Agriculture; 2012. p. 170–9. ISBN: 9789984480527.
33.              Bruneckienė J, Zykienė I, Stankevičius V. Critical analysis of city attractiveness factors in Lithuania–Poland cross-border regions: the viewpoints of businessmen and youth. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society. 2016 Dec 5;6(2):45-58.
34.              Assunção ERGTR, Ferreira FAF, Meidutė‑Kavaliauskienė I, Zopounidis C, Pereira LF, Correia RJC. Rethinking urban sustainability using fuzzy cognitive mapping and system dynamics. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 2020;27(3):261–75. doi:10.1080/13504509.2020.1722973
35.              Heurkens E. Private sector-led urban development projects: Management, partnerships and effects in the Netherlands and the UK. TU Delft; 2012 Sep 4.
36.              Nijkamp P, Groot HG, Evers D. A case study on the Amsterdam Zuidas mega‑project: public–private partnership and regional development companies. VU University Amsterdam, Department of Spatial Economics Working Paper. 2009;1–45.
37.              Yeager N. Urban Planning in Amsterdam [Internet]. Medium; [cited 2025 Jul 21]. Available from: https://medium.com/@nicholasyeager2020/urban-planning-in-amsterdam-52577c57e9a0
38.              Sikumbang IH, Yola L. The transformation of the marina bay sand area: the history of managing the energy balance of Singapore. International Review of Humanities Studies. 2023 Jul 31;8(2):3.
39.              Heurkens E. Private sector-led urban development projects: Management, partnerships and effects in the Netherlands and the UK. TU Delft; 2012 Sep 4.
40.              Hwang JS, Heo YJ, Han A, Hwang JS, Ju B; World Bank Group Korea Office. Smart Cities in the Republic of Korea: A Journey Toward Institutionalization and Innovation [Internet]. Innovation and Technology Note No. 9. Washington (DC): World Bank Group; Sep 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 21]. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099501509212220541
Volume 3, Issue 1
Spring 2026
Pages 33-50

  • Receive Date 23 July 2025
  • Revise Date 02 September 2025
  • Accept Date 17 November 2025
  • Publish Date 31 March 2026